tmb_guardians

All eyes will be on Marvel next year as the long-gestating Avengers finally gets released. With that cast and Joss Whedon at the helm, it’s very promising, but clearly Marvel are seeing it as the beginning of the next phase of their movie plans, not the culmination.

io9 have spotted a few snippets in Entertainment Weekly that handily spell out what Marvel are planning on doing after their first superhero teamup. Obviously, there are sequels to Thor, Iron Man and Captain America all confirmed, but that’s not all. They’re reporting that Ant Man, despite rumours, is not dead and that would tie in with a recent interview Joe Cornish did where he said himself and Edgar Wright have finished another draft.

But that’s not all. Kevin Feige mentions in the article that thanks to Thor opening up the idea of a ‘cosmic’ Marvel film, Guardians of the Galaxy is now a very real possibility and not just a rumour. We’ve reported this before, but it was basically pure speculation then, whilst this comes from the head honcho himself. This is fantastic news – Guardians of the Galaxy is another superhero team movie, but it’s all in space, and with an amazingly varied roster of characters. There is gigantic potential for this title, with Feige going as far as to say that an even BIGGER team up of Avengers & Guardians in one colossal movie.

What do you think of this news? Personally I’m such a huge Marvel fan I think it’s fantastic – I love how they’re treating their movies like comic-books in ways. However, many believe that the films suffer because of this. With Guardians there’s a potentially distinct franchise that could run alongside Avengers, with both culminating in one giant movie – it’s hard not to get excited about that, as far away as it is! As it stands, it’s great to hear they’re looking to some less-famous properties and still working on Ant Man, which could turn out very well itself.

[More]

tmb_guardians

All eyes will be on Marvel next year as the long-gestating Avengers finally gets released. With that cast and Joss Whedon at the helm, it’s very promising, but clearly Marvel are seeing it as the beginning of the next phase of their movie plans, not the culmination.

io9 have spotted a few snippets in Entertainment Weekly that handily spell out what Marvel are planning on doing after their first superhero teamup. Obviously, there are sequels to Thor, Iron Man and Captain America all confirmed, but that’s not all. They’re reporting that Ant Man, despite rumours, is not dead and that would tie in with a recent interview Joe Cornish did where he said himself and Edgar Wright have finished another draft.

But that’s not all. Kevin Feige mentions in the article that thanks to Thor opening up the idea of a ‘cosmic’ Marvel film, Guardians of the Galaxy is now a very real possibility and not just a rumour. We’ve reported this before, but it was basically pure speculation then, whilst this comes from the head honcho himself. This is fantastic news – Guardians of the Galaxy is another superhero team movie, but it’s all in space, and with an amazingly varied roster of characters. There is gigantic potential for this title, with Feige going as far as to say that an even BIGGER team up of Avengers & Guardians in one colossal movie.

What do you think of this news? Personally I’m such a huge Marvel fan I think it’s fantastic – I love how they’re treating their movies like comic-books in ways. However, many believe that the films suffer because of this. With Guardians there’s a potentially distinct franchise that could run alongside Avengers, with both culminating in one giant movie – it’s hard not to get excited about that, as far away as it is! As it stands, it’s great to hear they’re looking to some less-famous properties and still working on Ant Man, which could turn out very well itself.

[More]



It seems that we may not have seen the last of the Scream franchise. Series creator Wes Craven, in an interview with Movieweb, revealed "The odds are that there will be (a Scream 5). It is something that Bob Weinstein wants to do. He tends to do what he wants to do". He added: "So I am inclined to think that there will be (another sequel). Whether I will be a part of it or not? I don't know. My contract gives me the first look."If they show me something that is really wonderful? Of course I will be a part of it."



Whether or not we need another instalment of the long-running horror series is up for debate. The movies have built up a dedicated following over the years, due mainly to their subversive take on the horror genre. However with Scream 4 being released to middling reviews and box office, as well as tying up most of the series' loose ends, it appeared that it had run it's course. With most of the residents of Woodsboro dead at this stage (at least the best looking ones), perhaps the franchise should go the same way, or at least wait a few years before making the inevitable reboot. 5cream anyone?


[More]



It seems that we may not have seen the last of the Scream franchise. Series creator Wes Craven, in an interview with Movieweb, revealed "The odds are that there will be (a Scream 5). It is something that Bob Weinstein wants to do. He tends to do what he wants to do". He added: "So I am inclined to think that there will be (another sequel). Whether I will be a part of it or not? I don't know. My contract gives me the first look."If they show me something that is really wonderful? Of course I will be a part of it."



Whether or not we need another instalment of the long-running horror series is up for debate. The movies have built up a dedicated following over the years, due mainly to their subversive take on the horror genre. However with Scream 4 being released to middling reviews and box office, as well as tying up most of the series' loose ends, it appeared that it had run it's course. With most of the residents of Woodsboro dead at this stage (at least the best looking ones), perhaps the franchise should go the same way, or at least wait a few years before making the inevitable reboot. 5cream anyone?


[More]

Quite the drama surrounded Red State, from the Clerks guy, Kevin Smith. Most famously, Smith bought Red State and released it himself. That was back in January at Sundance. So, now that the movie has finally made it to this neck of the woods, what's it like?

Set in middle America, a group of teenagers end up in a whole heap of trouble after receiving an online invitation for some nooky. When they arrive at the lovin’ location, things take a turn for the worse and they end up being abducted by religious fundamentalists and are kept prisoner in a compound run by Abin Copper (Michael Parks). For the later half of the movie, the story changes into a violent escape from the nutjobs coupled with a police siege led up by John Goodman.

Red State is essentially a movie of 2 quite distinctive halves. And it’s the first half that really hammers home the religious fundamentalist crackpots, and it really puts out the perception that these people are walking amongst us, every single day. This is made more convincing by a pretty decent cast, in particular Michael Parks, who is rather outstanding. Alas, the second half doesn’t make as much of an impact. Out is the creepy, eerie almost terrifying fundamentalism  and in comes your average shoot out, which to be fair, isn’t that bad as it twists, turns and fires magazines of bullets around the place, coupled with a rather healthier looking John Goodman.

tmb_redstate6

Performance wise, there are a few unknowns here, but Parks is on fire, and his followers all rock the subservient vibe rather well. The teenagers are very likeable and you make a connection with them quite quickly which in turn helps as the story unfolds and you really feel sorry for them.The movie does move at a decent enough pace and your not really left hanging around in any capacity.

I’m genuinely a big fan of Kevin Smith, and this is certainly a different departure for him compared to the rest of his filmography. There’s no point in hammering on about why he made this movie and the drama surrounding it. That’s old news. Instead, take this as a movie from the filmmaker Kevin Smith, not the Clerks guy. By no means is it amazing, but it’s solid enough to make it more than watchable.

3-stars_thumb

[More]

Quite the drama surrounded Red State, from the Clerks guy, Kevin Smith. Most famously, Smith bought Red State and released it himself. That was back in January at Sundance. So, now that the movie has finally made it to this neck of the woods, what's it like?

Set in middle America, a group of teenagers end up in a whole heap of trouble after receiving an online invitation for some nooky. When they arrive at the lovin’ location, things take a turn for the worse and they end up being abducted by religious fundamentalists and are kept prisoner in a compound run by Abin Copper (Michael Parks). For the later half of the movie, the story changes into a violent escape from the nutjobs coupled with a police siege led up by John Goodman.

Red State is essentially a movie of 2 quite distinctive halves. And it’s the first half that really hammers home the religious fundamentalist crackpots, and it really puts out the perception that these people are walking amongst us, every single day. This is made more convincing by a pretty decent cast, in particular Michael Parks, who is rather outstanding. Alas, the second half doesn’t make as much of an impact. Out is the creepy, eerie almost terrifying fundamentalism  and in comes your average shoot out, which to be fair, isn’t that bad as it twists, turns and fires magazines of bullets around the place, coupled with a rather healthier looking John Goodman.

tmb_redstate6

Performance wise, there are a few unknowns here, but Parks is on fire, and his followers all rock the subservient vibe rather well. The teenagers are very likeable and you make a connection with them quite quickly which in turn helps as the story unfolds and you really feel sorry for them.The movie does move at a decent enough pace and your not really left hanging around in any capacity.

I’m genuinely a big fan of Kevin Smith, and this is certainly a different departure for him compared to the rest of his filmography. There’s no point in hammering on about why he made this movie and the drama surrounding it. That’s old news. Instead, take this as a movie from the filmmaker Kevin Smith, not the Clerks guy. By no means is it amazing, but it’s solid enough to make it more than watchable.

3-stars_thumb

[More]

DOWNLOAD PODCASTS

POPULAR BITS